Social Media Bans for Kids: What Parents Need to Know — and What a Ban Won't Cover
What the new under-16 social media bans in the EU, UK, Canada and Australia actually change for your family, what a ban won't cover, and what to do now.
What happened: a wave of under-16 rules

Within a few weeks in September 2026, the idea of a minimum age for social media moved from a handful of national experiments toward something closer to an international norm. On 17 September, the European Commission proposed the EU KIDS Act: no social media accounts under 13, “mini accounts” set up with a parent or guardian, with limited features and a one-hour daily limit, for 13- and 14-year-olds, and their own accounts from 15. The age limits would apply to social media and video-sharing platforms; the wider proposal also sets safety rules for online games and AI companions.
Our KIDS Act is reversing the burden of proof - it is for platforms to show they are safe by design. And we put parents back in the driving seat, giving them the tools to help their children navigate a safer online world.
— Ursula von der Leyen, European Commission press release (17 September 2026)
It is a proposal, not a law. The European Parliament and EU governments must negotiate and agree a final text, and legal observers don't expect it to apply before 2028.
In the UK, the groundwork is already law. The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026, passed in April, lets ministers restrict children's access to specific services by regulation. In June the government said it would use that power for an under-16 ban on platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Facebook and X. Its fact sheet, updated on 18 September, says the first regulations will be laid before the end of the year, with the changes implemented in spring 2027.
Canada's Bill C-34, introduced in June, would set a minimum age of 16 for social media accounts and also covers AI chatbot services; it is awaiting its second reading in the House of Commons. Denmark has put an age limit of 15 out for consultation, aiming for July 2027. Public support is broad, at least in the US: in a Pew Research Center survey published in July, 56% of US adults — and 65% of parents of under-18s — said they would support banning social media for under-16s (Pew, 2026).
Where things stand — and what Australia shows so far
The headlines blur four very different situations: rules in force, rules passed but not yet active, proposals, and one ban struck down in court. Here is the short version.
- Australia — in forceSince 10 December 2025, under-16s can't hold accounts on the platforms eSafety has named — among them Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube and X. Platforms, not families, face the penalties.
- Malaysia — in forceSince 1 June 2026, platforms must verify users' age. Under-16s can't have their own accounts and may use platforms only through a parent's or guardian's account.
- Indonesia — in forceSince 28 March 2026, under-16 accounts on platforms the government classes as high-risk — including YouTube, TikTok, Instagram and Roblox — are being deactivated.
- Brazil — in force, not a banSince 17 March 2026, accounts of under-16s must be linked to a parent or guardian, with supervision tools and reliable age checks.
- United Kingdom — power passed, rules dueAn under-16 ban on major platforms such as Instagram, TikTok and YouTube is planned for spring 2027. Messaging apps such as WhatsApp and Signal are excluded.
- European Union — proposedThe KIDS Act proposal: no accounts under 13, “mini accounts” set up with a parent or guardian at 13–14, own accounts from 15. Parliament and EU governments must still agree.
- Canada — bill in ParliamentBill C-34 would set 16 as the minimum age for social media accounts. It is awaiting second reading.
- France — struck downOn 14 August 2026, the Constitutional Council struck down the law's ban on social networks for under-15s as disproportionate.
Australia is the longest-running large test so far, and its early numbers are more modest than the headlines. The government says more than 5 million under-16 accounts have been removed, deactivated or restricted — a count of accounts, not children. The eSafety Commissioner's own evaluation, surveying children three months in, found the share of under-16s holding a social media account fell from 52.4% to 42.1%, and the share using the platforms at all from 85.9% to 81.5%.
Most under-16s who had social media accounts before commencement were able to either retain them or create new ones at the three-month mark, with social media platforms' failure to implement effective age assurance measures cited as the main reason.
— eSafety Commissioner, media release on the evaluation's early insights (July 2026)
Separate figures from Qustodio — drawn from devices running its parental-control software, so not a representative sample — suggest TikTok use among Australian 13- to 15-year-olds climbed back close to pre-ban levels, while WhatsApp, which the ban doesn't cover, rose from 27% to 36% (The Next Web, 2026). None of this means the ban has failed — a formal review is due within two years. It does mean a ban works like a slow, leaky filter, not a switch.
What it means for your family

For most families, nothing changes this week. Outside Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia and Brazil (where under-16 accounts must now be linked to a parent), the headline rules are proposals or not yet in force, and in the US they depend on your state and the courts. When a rule does arrive where you live, four things are likely to be true.
- The duty sits with platforms, not families. In Australia there are no penalties for under-16s or their parents, and the eSafety Commissioner warns that any message demanding a “fine” is a scam. The UK, EU and Canadian plans follow the same model.
- Expect more age checks. Platforms will increasingly estimate or verify age when accounts are opened; the EU is piloting its own age-verification app. Age estimation is least reliable within a few years either side of the cut-off, so some teens will slip through and some older teens will be asked to prove their age.
- Existing accounts may close. Where a ban takes effect, platforms remove or deactivate under-age accounts. In Australia, some platforms froze accounts rather than deleting them and offered a chance to download photos and data first — but the account, and the connections your teen built there, are out of reach until they are old enough.
- The age line differs. Most plans use 16, but the EU proposal uses 13 and 15, Denmark's plan 15, Malaysia lets under-16s use platforms through a parent's or guardian's account, and Brazil links under-16 accounts to a parent rather than banning them. The rule your teen hears about online may not be the one that applies to them.
Whether you welcome these laws or doubt them, the parenting job is the same: know where your teen actually spends time online, and be the person they come to when something goes wrong — on any app, banned or not.
What a ban won't cover

A social media ban covers the big feed-based platforms. Much of a teen's online life happens elsewhere, and in most plans those places stay open. They aren't reasons to panic — they are where your attention does the most good.
- Accounts on Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Facebook and X
- Accounts on YouTube
- In Australia, also Threads, Reddit, Twitch and Kick
- Messaging apps such as WhatsApp, Messenger and Signal
- Online games with chat, such as Roblox, and community apps like Discord
- AI chatbots and companion apps
- Watching videos without logging in
- Shared family devices and other people's accounts
Messaging and games. Group chats and in-game chat are where many teens already spend most of their social time, and where a stranger can still start a conversation. Australia's regulator says online harms can also happen on the alternative apps under-16s use, including messaging and gaming platforms. If your teen plays online, our guides to Roblox parental controls and whether Discord is safe for kids cover the settings that matter.
AI chatbots. Companion and chatbot apps sit outside Australia's minimum-age rule, which handles them through separate industry codes; the UK says romantic companion chatbots will have to enforce an 18+ age limit. For what to watch for, see our guide to AI companion chatbots and teens.
Logged-out video. A teen without an account can still watch most public YouTube videos — but without the account, the parental supervision tools you may have set up no longer apply, as Google itself has pointed out.
Workarounds, shared devices and quieter corners. Some teens will stay on banned apps through workarounds — a VPN, a borrowed account, a shared family device. The deeper risk isn't that this happens; it's that it happens somewhere you can no longer see. eSafety's evaluation found parents' awareness of their children's social media use had fallen in some groups, and when Australia's ban began, UNICEF warned that young people turning to workarounds, shared devices or less-regulated platforms would only be harder to protect (UN News, December 2025).
What to do now, wherever you live

To prepare your family for a social media ban — or simply to act on the concerns behind one — you don't need to wait for your government. These steps draw on guidance from Australia's eSafety Commissioner, the American Psychological Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics.
- Talk about it as protection, not punishment. Ask what your teen has heard before you say what you think. “There's a lot of news about banning social media for teens. What are your friends saying about it?” If an account is going to close, acknowledge the loss honestly — for many teens it's where their friendships live.
- Map where your teen actually spends time. Not an interrogation — a tour. “Show me the three apps you'd miss most.” Make sure the list includes messaging apps, games with chat and any AI chatbot, because those are the places most bans leave open.
- Set up the controls that still apply. Turn on the family features in the messaging apps, games and video services your teen keeps using — and explain each one before you switch it on. Our parental controls guide walks through the major devices and platforms.
- Protect friendships and the basics. If an account is closing, help your teen save the photos and contacts that matter and work out other ways to stay in touch with friends. Keep device-free times and places at home, and protect at least eight hours of sleep, as the APA recommends for adolescents.
A family media plan — the American Academy of Pediatrics offers a free one at HealthyChildren.org — is a simple way to write these agreements down together, so they belong to your teen as much as to you.
Frequently asked questions
When will the UK social media ban start?
It hasn't started yet. The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 gave ministers the legal power, and the government plans an under-16 ban on Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Facebook and X. Its fact sheet says the first regulations will be laid before the end of 2026 and the changes should be implemented in spring 2027. Messaging services such as WhatsApp and Signal are not included.
Which apps does a social media ban cover?
It depends on the country. Australia's ban covers the platforms its eSafety Commissioner has named, including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube and Reddit; WhatsApp, Messenger, Discord, Roblox, Steam and YouTube Kids are not age-restricted there, and the list can change. Indonesia's list, by contrast, includes Roblox. The UK plan targets platforms such as Instagram, YouTube and TikTok and leaves out messaging apps. The EU proposal's age limits cover social media and video-sharing, with separate rules for games and AI chatbots.
Will parents be fined if their child uses social media?
Not under the model most countries are following. In Australia, the legal duty sits with platforms, and there are no penalties for under-16s or for their parents or carers; the eSafety Commissioner warns that any message demanding a “fine” is a scam. The UK, EU and Canadian plans also put the obligation on companies. Parents are not expected to police the rule — but they are still best placed to help their teen through it.
Will my child's existing account be deleted?
Where a ban is in force, platforms must remove or deactivate under-age accounts. In Australia, the government says more than 5 million under-16 accounts have been removed, deactivated or restricted since December 2025 — accounts, not individual children — and some platforms froze accounts and offered data downloads rather than deleting them outright. Elsewhere nothing is being deleted yet. If a rule is coming where you live, help your teen save photos and contacts they care about.
Can kids still watch YouTube without an account?
In Australia, yes: under-16s can still watch most public YouTube videos without logging in, and YouTube Kids is not age-restricted. The trade-off is supervision. Google has said that parents lose the ability to supervise their teen's YouTube account and the controls they had set up, because the teen no longer has one. For younger children, YouTube Kids keeps parental settings; for teens, logged-out viewing is a gap to talk about.
Is the EU banning social media for children?
Not yet. On 17 September 2026 the European Commission proposed the EU KIDS Act: no social media under 13, “mini accounts” set up with a parent or guardian, with a one-hour daily limit, for 13- and 14-year-olds, and own accounts from 15. It is a proposal — the European Parliament and EU governments must negotiate and agree a final text first, and legal observers don't expect it to apply before 2028.
Which countries have banned social media for under-16s?
As of 30 September 2026, Australia enforces an under-16 minimum age on the major platforms its regulator has named, Malaysia requires platforms to verify age and bars under-16s from having their own accounts, and Indonesia is deactivating under-16 accounts on high-risk platforms. The UK plans its ban for spring 2027, Canada has a bill before Parliament, and Denmark is consulting on 15. France's under-15 ban was struck down by its Constitutional Council.